DuckDB on a lambda/serverless python function wrapper or in WASM (for client-sid... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		mrbungie 73 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Snowflake to buy Crunchy Data for $250M DuckDB on a lambda/serverless python function wrapper or in WASM (for client-side workloads) is as stateless and serverless as you can get. In that case BigQuery is more managed than both, PAYG for analytical queries without thinking about compute nor clusters whatsoever.

9283409232 73 days ago [–]

BigQuery is more expensive than Snowflake though. You might as well just do Motherduck which would be cheaper than BQ but let you pull data from S3 which is cheaper than Snowflake storage.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact