And to make sure that agent doesn’t make mistakes I have a different agent review that agents work!

Well given reading code is more tedious than writing it and the author of this article claims gai is most useful for tedious or repetitive code, why would you want to read it? Since this AI agent understands and reasons about the text it writes and reads it should be pretty infallible at checking the code too, right?

Just get another agent to review it and merge it, job done.

Plus, the sales agents are running to promote the finished product to other companies and close deals, and the accounting agents are checking that all expenses are being accounted for and we have a positive cash flow. Obviously, the audit agents are checking that no errors sneak into this process, according to a plan devised by the legal agents.

Because at thats what you need to do to get a 943x coder black belt

why not use AI to summarize the code for you?

The parent neglected to add /s

I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not, but if you are, the real world is not far behind. I can imagine a world where a mixture of AI agents (some doing hypercritical code review) can return you tested and idiomatic PRs faster than you can describe the new architecture in issues.

I think a lot of people are unfamiliar with the (expensive) SOTA.