> FSD is way more unreliable than an average drunk driver.
Than an average drunk driver, or you drunk driving? One of my first drinking buddies when I was still an alcoholic (decades ago) was actually an excellent driver when drunk, but most people I knew at that time couldn't hardly even walk let alone drive when drunk.
When I used the free trials of FSD, It kept doing dangerous things and I kept needing to intervene. It seems a lot of people conflate the fact that the technology is impressive with the fact that it's still quite dangerous.
> FSD is way more unreliable than an average drunk driver.
I'm thinking you mean something like someone who blows a 0.1 or 0.12, or possibly drank 2-3 beers. (IE, someone who is impaired but probably won't get into an accident.) That would be an interesting thing to try to test objectively, because there are way more people who drive in that state, (including off-duty police officers), than a lot of people realize.
It's a troll, or someone who actually doesn't understand the difference between an individual example and statistics. The claim is so bad it's not worth discussing.
