Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Search for "flicker fusion rate" to learn a lot more about this.





That talks about the mechanics of visual perception. I'm discussing qualia, which I am far more confident crows share with me than does the particular subtype of Hacker News commenter who will with tiresome predictability and total lack of novelty turn up to press the footless insistence that crows could never.

Mine is 42 Hz according to a recent examination. Are high refresh rate monitors are wasted on this pair of eyes?

Our flicker fusion rate is different for the fovea and nearby central vision vs the peripheral vision.

The central vision is slower-response, higher-resolution, and of course color vision.

The peripheral vision is monochrome and has a much faster flicker-fusion, tuned to picking up motion in the periphery.

So, the same flicker rate that you never notice on a small monitor may flicker annoyingly on a large monitor. To check that a setup will not flicker for you, set it up in a darkish room, focus around 70°-100° to one side of the monitor so it is in your peripheral vision, and both look at one place and notice your periphery, and also move your focus quickly from one place to another and notice if the screen blurs like bright stationary objects or looks like a discontinuous blur (really easy to get that effect with fluorescent lights). Do it both left & right and towards the ceiling. If flicker shows up in these tests, it will still eventually bug you when looking directly at the screen, even if it isn't as noticeable because your focus is in the center of your vision.


No. Flicker fusion only happens when the same image is shown at the same position.

Something like a moving mouse cursor shows the same image at different positions. As an experiment, create a fullscreen image with the opposite color of your mouse cursor. Look at a fixed spot of this image, then rapidly move your mouse cursor across it. Rather than a moving image, you will see a bunch of copies of the cursor at fixed positions.

Similarly, track a rapidly moving cursor with your eyes. It will appear blurry, even though your eyes have no trouble sharply seeing an object moving at that speed in the natural world.

You can also try flashing an image for a very short amount of time. You'll be able to see and remember its content, even when it is being displayed for a period far shorter than flicker fusion would suggest you'd be able to see.


I don't know. Have you tried one? That's neither the rhetorical nor the dismissive response it may seem...

The mouse is very snappy compared to a 60 Hz display.

Just do a basic double blind test. get someone else to switch the hz a couple of times for you, and see if you can tell the difference. i would be surprised if you got anything less than a 100% success rate.

Dr Nyquist recommends double +1



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: