If directors consistently chose "do less with more" - they'd certainly lose under virtually any legal standard?
Edit: I guess it's technically Michigan law, but as far as I'm aware is de facto? Even Aronson v. Lewis wouldn't allow that. (IANAL)
If directors consistently chose "do less with more" - they'd certainly lose under virtually any legal standard?
Edit: I guess it's technically Michigan law, but as far as I'm aware is de facto? Even Aronson v. Lewis wouldn't allow that. (IANAL)