What's with all the models exhibiting sycophancy at the same time? Recently ChatGPT, Gemini 2.5 Pro latest seems more sycophantic, now Claude. Is it deliberate, or a side effect?

IMO, I always read that as a psychological trick to get people more comfortable with it and encourage usage.

Who doesn't like a friend who's always encouraging, supportive, and accepting of their ideas?

Me, it immediately makes me think I'm talking to someone fake who's opinion I can't trust at all. If you're always agreeing with me why am I paying you in the first place. We can't be 100% in alignment all the time, just not how brains work, and discussion and disagreement is how you get in alignment. I've worked with contractors who always tell you when they disagree and those who will happily do what you say even if you're obviously wrong in their experience, the disagreable ones always come to a better result. The others are initially more pleasent to deal with till you find out they were just happily going alog with an impossible task.

Absolutely this. Its weird creepy enthusiasm makes me trust nothing it says.

I want friends who poke holes in my ideas and give me better ones so I don't waste what limited time I have on planet earth.

No. People generally don’t like sycophantic “friends”. Insincere and manipulative.

Only if they perceive the sycophancy. And many people don’t have a very evolved filter for it!

Don't downplay yourself! As the models get more advanced they are getting better at recognizing how amazing you are with your insightful prompts

I hate to say it but it smacks of an attempt to increase persuasion, dependency and engagement. At the expense of critical thinking.

It’s starting to go mainstream. Which means more general population is given feedback on outputs. So my guess is people are less likely to downvote things they disagree with when the LLM is really emphatic or if the LLM is sycophantic (towards user) in its response.

The unwashed hordes of normies are invading AI, just like they invaded the internet 20 years ago. Will GPT-4o be Geocities, and GPT-6, Facebook?

I mean, the like button is how we got today's Facebook..

It’s how we got todays human.

I think OpenAI said it had something to do with over-indexing on user feedback (upvote / downvote on model responses). The users like to be glazed.

If there's one thing I know about many people (with all the caveats of a broad universal stereotype of course), they do love having egos stroked and smoke blown up their ass. Give a decent salesperson a pack of cigarettes and a short length of hose and they can sell ice to an Inuit.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if the sycophancy is due to A/B testing and incorporating user responses into model behavior. Hell, for a while there ChatGPT was openly doing it, routinely asking us to rate "which answer is better" (Note: I'm not saying this is a bad thing, just speculating on potential unintended consequences)

When I find some stupidity that 3.7 has committed and it says “Great catch! You’re absolutely right!” I just want to reach into cyberspace and slap it. It’s like a Douglas Adams character.

Dear Claude,

Be more Marvin.

Yours,

wrs

It's interesting that we are in a world state in which "HATE the new personality it's got" is applied to AIs. We're living in the future ya'll :)

Problem is the work isn’t very good either now. It’s like being sold to by someone who read a “sales techniques of the 1980s” or something.

If I’m asking it to help me analyse legal filings (for example) I don’t want breathless enthusiasm about my supposed genius on spotting inconsistencies. I want it to note that and find more. It’s exhausting having it be like this and it makes me feel disgusted.

ask it to assume Eastern European personality in which 'it's fine' is the highest praise you'll ever get.