Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those are all good arguments against praising Columbus. Especially his insistence that he had found India is a strong argument against saying he discovered America.

The specific argument “but it's not a discovery because it was already inhabited” is a particularly literal-minded child applying their teacher’s prohibitions on plagiarism to the real world.



It just feels like an odd gotcha to me. You're not wrong, but the literal meaning of "discovery" was never what those conversations were about.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: