Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It still wouldn't lead to proper Rust concurrency safety, because their IO is still blocking.



What’s blocking IO have to do with this topic?

Also, I don’t feel like that’s true: Rust has the exact same non blocking IO primitives in the stdlib as any other systems language: O_NONBLOCK, multiplexers, and so on. Combined with async/await syntax sugar for concurrency and backends like Tokyo, I’m not sure how you end up at “rust IO is still blocking”.


Lock-freeness is an important step to concurrency safety. Rust falsely calls itself concurrency safe.

For a system language it's great to finally have a lock free library for some containers, but that's still not safe.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: