Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I quoted the part that is instigating a political argument.





You quoted my hypothesis for why you edited your original comment. I did not imply anything about MAGA, I implied something about you because it is you who is the subject of my comment, not MAGA.

Allow me to use my top-secret CSI computer to enhance:

> beyond the pale at this point to try to treat MAGA as a good faith actor


Reading compression is fundamental (although it's a pity we'll be the last generation to learn that): it's my hypothesis about your state of mind when you changed the comment.

What's funny is that you could easily cut this gordian knot by simply setting the record straight and explaining why you changed the comment from the original exhortation to the current litigious one. But you haven't, across 3 more comments lol.


Please refrain from including swipes in your posts.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: