Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This seems like a workable idea but just electric cranes lifting and lowering weights seems like a simpler approach and I think that has already been proposed.

My guess is there are many ways to balance the grid and the biggest is the utilities not wanting pay.

One thing to consider is the America power grid is in poor shape already and utilities are aiming to avoid modernizing. IE, adding storage to the grid would involve the double of cost of the actual balance equipment and the fixing the old equipment that needs fixing anyway. And utilities are looking avoid both cost.



I was actually wondering why the whole thing needed the complexity of being underwater and felt like I was just an idiot, so thanks.

From the article it sounds like the only reason to deal with the hassle of the water is so you can put these somewhere no one ever sees?


I think when you lift a cubic meter of water by one meter at a depth of 500 meters, it is like lifting an entire column of 500 cubic meters. It's a huge multiplier effect.


They specifically talk about putting them deep. There's only one thing to be gained by going deep: pressure.

It sounds like this is simply compressed air storage, except using seawater to contain it so you don't need a pressure vessel.


There is no air involved. They are pumping water out, creating a vacuum. Water rushing back in generates power. No need to compress air or have a hose to the surface.


Making a big hollow object that can withstand crushing is much cheaper than something that can contain high pressure. Achieving the same pressure difference on the surface wouldn't be possible with concrete alone.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: