Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Nope, that's actually not what I said. Nice try though!



So the Washington Post is extremely anti-Trump but once or twice the owner stepped in and forced them to remain neutral _maybe_ so as not to jeopardize government contracts for one of his other companies. But also there was a big backlash, and he probably could never do this again or the very least extremely infrequently?


> So the Washington Post… owner stepped in… so as not to jeopardize government contracts for one of his other companies

I see. So “in fear of being targeted in retaliation” then?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: