While I agree giving away money can have negative secondary effects, destroying the money makes no sense and is positively moronic. He should just give it to his kids if he doesn't know what to do with it.
It’s like during the coronavirus, more money was given to people without related increase in real-world generated
value: result, prices increase and people who had savings can now do less with them.
Injecting this money may create inflation and accidentally increase poverty as more money becomes freely available and circulating.
Could be in some way better to just destroy it ?