> As such impossible to the extent that our experiences are not compatible with those of an intelligence that does not put emphasis on lived context trying to substitute for it with offline batch learning.
Conversely that means empathy is possible to the extent that our experiences are compatible with those of an AI. That is precisely what's under consideration here and you have not shown that it is zero.
an intelligence that does not put emphasis on lived context trying to substitute for it with offline batch learning.
Will change your tune when online learning comes along?
Lived context is to me more than online learning. I admit I am not so versed in the space as to be able to anticipate the nature of context in the case of online learning, so, yes, indeed I may change my tune if it somehow makes learning more of an experience rather than an education. My understanding is it won’t. I have not proven, but argued that experience compatibility is zero, to the extent a Lim does not experience anything. Happy to accept alternative viewpoints and accordingly that someone may perceive something as a sign of empathy whether it is or not.
Conversely that means empathy is possible to the extent that our experiences are compatible with those of an AI. That is precisely what's under consideration here and you have not shown that it is zero.
an intelligence that does not put emphasis on lived context trying to substitute for it with offline batch learning.
Will change your tune when online learning comes along?