I find it odd that they can provide all the
infrastructure compute / storage / bandwidth
for all of these projects for $35K
Debian and Fedora on their own must be highly demanding??
Form the article:
"""
Currently provides infrastructure hosting for projects such as
Drupal,
Gentoo Linux,
Debian,
Fedora,
phpBB,
OpenID,
Buildroot/Busybox,
Inkscape,
Cinc and many more!
"""
Most of Debian's infra is elsewhere, but OSU does host a backup server, logs server, a bugs.d.o frontend, POWER/MIPS/HPPA/RISC-V build/porting servers.
You'd be surprised, this is one of the ways in which Red Hat stays independent from their mothership. IBM prefers to donate to OSUOSL and Red Hat uses it for Fedora.
Then there are private labs, internal to Red Hats, that are used by developers especially for testing, but they're not stocked particularly better than they were prior to the acquisition.
They need university budget for items that aren’t donated in-kind rather than as cash by sponsors. Build servers can be donated by granting OSU access and paying the bill. But someone has to manage those donated services, and none of the existing donation agreements apparently include cash on table to pay for that headcount (since they did not until this year).
My understanding is that a lot of ISPs use linux mirrors as an offset for asymmetric bandwidth, which can lead to one-sided network charges. As such, they're happy to donate bandwidth to the degree it benefits their negotiations elsewhere.
Debian and Fedora on their own must be highly demanding??
Form the article: """ Currently provides infrastructure hosting for projects such as Drupal, Gentoo Linux, Debian, Fedora, phpBB, OpenID, Buildroot/Busybox, Inkscape, Cinc and many more! """