Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If you just keep sprinting through such exercises, in a sense, mindlessly, without asking yourself how each new sentence really differs from the ones you have already seen, then yes, IMHO you are likely to fail.

This is where comprehensible input shines.

- you start reading actual long form content from day one instead of practice sentences

- the content maintains the context across its length, letting the brain use its pattern recognition apparatus

This does not happen with the grammar translation method. You lose the context. I would compare it with RAM being swapped to disk repeatedly in a low-ram situation on your computer.

I have never studied the grammar of my mother tongue. But I can speak complex sentences rapidly because my brain managed to recognize the patterns in the language and store the sequence information somewhere.

If they expend deliberate effort on it, some people might find methods like the ones Duolingo uses somewhat useful. However, I believe if you are capable of doing that, comprehensible input might give you more bang for the buck. It has, at least for me, provided faster results and a better vocabulary than grammar translation and half-hearted attempts at CI. I felt more confident with the language after 10 days of CI-based learning than the previous six months of memorizing noun and verb forms and meanings and translating random sentences.



It's also just a hell of a lot more fun.


Yep!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: