Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Agreed, but the points raised by GP are valid in terms of using that article as an argument that AVX-512 can decode UTF-8 well.

It might be fast, but it's not a UTF-8 decoder. It's a transcoder to a fixed, and very limited, target encoding.



I though it was pretty clear the GP was talking about Daniels article, not the blog post, but I guess I can see two readings.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: