Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What ? Nowhere in the article did it imply that.

It meant some of the implementations of those rely on Apple innovations i.e. patents. Which given how old Apple is, all of the patent acquisitions along the way and some pretty innovative work by NeXT it isn't inconceivable.

Doesn't mean that those patents will be enforceable.



See slide #8 and the notes for slide #8.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: