Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You should check out PEP 787



Oh! I missed this one because I've been looking specifically at the Packaging forum rather than the PEPs forum. This looks like a brilliant use case. (I'm aiming for wide compatibility - back to 3.6 - with my current projects, but I look forward to trying this out if and when it's accepted and implemented.)

Now if only the overall `subprocess` interface weren't so complex....


We really should just point most of these comments at that PEP. Thanks for getting it out so fast.


PEP 787 – Safer subprocess usage using t-strings https://peps.python.org/pep-0787/


Hmm, PEP-787 has some interesting discussions around it. I'll have to sort my thoughts on these aspects a bit.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: