Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Noncentral fallacy. Nobody's against "medical care for women" except where they believe it overlaps with "legalized murder of children", and it's extremely disingenuous for you to ignore that and act like "medical care" is the part they're against.





I’m disputing your claim that I am invoking a logical fallacy here.

Revoking access to life-critical medical care that is specific to one’s sex is indisputably making the people of a given sex less safe.

Threatening to persecute people who wish to assist women in pursuing life-critical medical care is making women less safe.

If medical care specific to one’s sex cannot be considered protecting the safety of someone on the basis of their sex, what is?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: