Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

According to existing Supreme Court precedent[1], nationalization of companies requires approval by Congress, not just the President, so that would make it more difficult.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youngstown_Sheet_%26_Tube_Co._...



According to existing Supreme Court precedent, the president isn't able to impound funds which had been allotted by Congress (line item veto) [1], or fire the head of an independent agency for reasons other than allowed by Congress [2], it doesn't really seem like precedent has much weight amongst those in power today.

[1] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/524/417/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humphrey%27s_Executor_v._Unite...


Precedent, with this Supreme Court, is meaningless.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: