I'm pretty positive about the ability to subdivide and build smaller.
But pushing this as a "friend compound" law is super weird. Are there really that many people who want a friend compound for their primary residence? Personally, I'd be hard pressed to think of more than 1-2 other couples with whom I'd want to co-develop property and even then only for a vacation home, not my regular house.
Yeah, exactly, we’ve talked about this a lot with friends from church and, IMO, this would be the best way to do it. It avoids the coercive danger of shared property and gives anybody the ability to exit whenever they want.
But pushing this as a "friend compound" law is super weird. Are there really that many people who want a friend compound for their primary residence? Personally, I'd be hard pressed to think of more than 1-2 other couples with whom I'd want to co-develop property and even then only for a vacation home, not my regular house.