Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I would further argue that #10 is wrong. He compares commits to a project you own to contributing to a project you don't own. If you don't have commit access to a svn server you are for the most part out of luck. Emailing the patch to a mailinglist or some dude is about the best option and even then it has a good chance of either not making it in or taking a very long time. So meanwhile you want to keep your changes going, how do you do that? A bunch of patches you apply every time you svn update? Run your own svn server, import their code and apply patches on that? What about merge (hell) time? Perhaps you do want commit access to the svn server. Just first mail this form via the post office to me or maybe fax the form and then after that first contribute 100 perfect patches and maybe then we will give you commit access. Ugg. Comparing this with Git where making your own fork where you can potentially make contributions from is _easy_ and you can publish this repo in many places.



Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: