Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


This is a consequence of the death of nuance. It was either a deliberate lab leak or a wet market jump -- pick your side. Masks either prevent COVID or are worthless -- pick your side. Either it's "just the flu" or 100% deadly -- pick your side. The vaccine will save you or it will make your heart give out -- pick a side.


I don't recall any big media stories pushing deliberate release.

Now that I think of it, I DO recall many bullshit spouters, commenters, fringe blogs, "independent journalists," who pushed deliberate release on their little corners of the internet, but who pays them any attention?


There was, bluntly, a mountain of bullshit from many angles. When trying to keep tabs on stuff for my sanity, I determined there’s multiple variants of the lab leak theory:

First, there’s the question of if it was an accident or a deliberate release

Second, (and on top of the first) that it was a lab-engineered strain or research on a naturally occurring strain.

The fringe sites seemed to overwhelmingly adopt the “deliberate release + lab engineered” theory.

On the deliberate release+bio engineered front: https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/dean-koontz-book-predi...

On the deliberate-release+bioengineered, but walking back the bioengineering, you have Tom Cotton (granted, the NYT editorial stance in this casts skepticism on Cotton) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/business/media/coronaviru...

There was a reasonable level of reporting stating that the wet market theory was one of a few possibilities, and that a leak was possible but couldn’t be conclusively determined.

My takeaway and bias is that we’ll never conclusively know the root cause. It became a blame game. The effort would be much better spent preparing for the next pandemic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: