> A second LLM then scored how well the facts aligned with those sources, specif... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		mmooss 11 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Mayo Clinic's secret weapon against AI hallucinati... > A second LLM then scored how well the facts aligned with those sources, specifically if there was a causal relationship between the two. What is 'causal' about it? Maybe I'm reading one word too closely, but an accurate citation or summary isn't a matter of cause and effect?

calciphus 11 months ago [–]

I read this as "what caused this statement to appear in the summary". Was it the source materials or the LLM base model / hallucination?

mmooss 11 months ago | [–]

I see what you mean. I guess even LLM errors come from the source materials, just along a path we don't like.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact