And this is exactly why you should not rely on AI without fundamental understanding.

That would only be true if the payout odds are even. And in my comment I explicitly say not 1:1 payout. Go ahead and ask the AI for clarification, I’m sure it can explain it to you. On Wikipedia, the factor is “b” - ie 2:1 payout and you would bet on a 50/50 event.

The intuition should be incredibly obvious here. I have a fair coin and will pay you 200 dollars for heads and take 1 dollar for tails. You would flip that coin as many times as I let you.

Even in your reply to this - ChatGPT is telling you in one situation you should not bet because the expected gain is nothing, and the other you don't know what to do - which is not equivalent. But the edge it is talking about is the expected gain over the probability of the event with the payout odds. If there is no edge, you won't bet. But you can have an edge with 50/50 odds, and if so you would bet.

Fails to see any difference other than "N/A" and "unpredictable":

     In the 50/50 case, the Kelly Criterion does provide an answer: don’t bet, because there’s no edge and no expected growth.

     In the unknown probabilities case, you can’t apply the formula at all, and you don’t have enough information to make an informed decision. You're essentially in the dark about how much to bet, and thus you cannot use the Kelly Criterion.