Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What is lost by going to this version?



If it’s anything like Safari’s declarative blocklists:

Ad blocking on Youtube.

Youtube-blocking Safari extensions “solve” Youtube blocking by using non-declarative APIs that need full access to Youtube. Apple seems ok with that so far, but the APIs are not as goods, so their success rate is limited.

Whether Google will allow new extensions that block Youtube remains to be seen.


> Ad blocking on Youtube.

uBlock Origin Lite blocks all ads on YouTube for me.


Google push out updates at regular intervals that detect the adblocker

why didn't you notice before? ublock origin has a special quick fixes list which updates very frequently, without Google's involvement

but with manifest v3: Google are now in charge and have to approve all "definition" updates

which they will only do once they've got a new detection method ready

and this is the entire point of manifest v3


>but with manifest v3: Google are now in charge and have to approve all "definition" updates

No, they don't. MV3 extensions are allowed to fetch remote data which definition updates would be.


Just saying, I've been using Lite for months. It's been fine.


they'd have to be really, really stupid to start doing it before their main countermeasure has been removed


> uBlock Origin Lite blocks all ads on YouTube for me.

Someone else is saying uBlock Origin Lite leaves a "skippable blank" where the ad used to be, while I know for a fact uBlock Origin completely and transparently skipped over the ad.

Could you confirm?


It completely blocks it.

But you have to change the toggle from basic filtering mode to complete filtering mode.

I think some people just haven't realized that.


Could you please tell me what "Youtube-blocking Safari extensions" are you referring? Are they MacOS only or can be installed on IPad? Thanks!


I can recommend Wipr 2 - excellent blocker from a great developer. I've now switched to Safari for all my YouTube watching. Universal purchase works on macOS, ipadOS and iOS.


I just downloaded it.

It works way better for Youtube than the one I had, and after some more testing I don't need the additional annoyance blockers I had. I might just go back to Safari!

Thanks for the recommendation.


Sure! AdBlock Pro blocks video ads for me, but it shows non-video ads that you gotta skip.

On iPad I just use Brave and haven't seen an ad yet.


custom filters / block lists


Realistically, how often is this functionality used en' mass? I remember using it once or twice throughout my lifetime of using this extension.


An ad blocker is useless to me if I can’t block whatever I want with it.


It's useless if it blocks 99.9% of what you need, but not the custom 0.1% you want on top?


As long as I have an alternative I would never choose the ad blocker that doesn’t let me block the elements I want.

For most websites I don’t care but there are many websites that I visit very often and removing annoying or useless elements and padding is practically mandatory at this point - I wouldn’t want to go back to not being able to do it.

So, answering your question, yes, “useless” was hyperbole.


I use different extensions for blocking individual elements on pages, like sticky headers or other custom divs. They're still working fine, e.g.:

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/click-to-remove-ele...


also you'd think that the pushers of this agenda would get real-time updates to things like block lists metadata. God knows they do it themselves several times a day...


dignity




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: