NoScript as a antipattern, because it disincentivises browsing new websites. As ...

rembicilious · 2025-03-05T09:23:19 1741166599

I don’t ever install NoScript on family/friend devices. It just breaks their experience. I have knowledgeable coworkers that won’t use it because it’s not worth the hassle for them.

So I agree it is an anti-pattern for typical use cases.

But if you’re trying to get the most out of old hardware, it will make some websites more usable.

whizzter · 2025-03-05T16:12:22 1741191142

That's the point, a _website_ should mostly be text,css and images and that works 100% fine with NoScript out of the box.

My pattern is basically browsing the wild net with FF/Noscript and use Chrome for "apps" (gmail,sheets,etc) that i feel have a reason to use JS.

kazinator · 2025-03-05T09:19:12 1741166352

It mainly disincentivizes using scummy sites the fetch JavaScript from 20 domains.

Sites that just fetch JavaScript from their own domain, not as much.