Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The history of your posts, oh my... But I will attempt to provide an answer in earnest.

All sane people are against an endless war. Or, any war for that matter. The only state that can be compared with an endless war is a mid-war period: the time when both sides know that the war is coming, and they live in misery, entrenching and militarizing, while the rest of human development stands still: economy is military-spending driven, birthrate falls, population flees, etc. Do we agree on that or do you need examples?

So, taking your question at its face value: the alternative is lasting peace. The history tells us that the only condition for lasting peace with Russia is either strong and decisive resistance or military alliance membership. Again, examples are a legion: both positive (Finland, Baltics, Turkiye), and negative (Georgia, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Syria, Chechnya to a certain degree).

The only path for lasting peace for Ukraine is to humiliate Russia on the battlefield. For that to happen they need weapons



"The history tells us that the only condition for lasting peace with Russia is either strong and decisive resistance or military alliance membership"

20th century history unfortunately tells us the answer is containment, not direct engagement.

From handing over Poland and eastern europe to Stalin in 1945, or refusing to protect Hungary in 1956 or interfere explicitly in the soviet sphere of influence, in exchange for them not interfering explicitly in western sphere of influence.

It's not a nice lesson, but that was how we achieved some form of peace for decades.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: