It's so odd seeing people dissuade others for implementing "niche" languages like Elixir or Gleam. If you post a job opportunity with these languages, I guarantee you will be swamped with qualified candidates that are very passionate and excited to work with these languages full time.

At this point I’m worried that because elixir is over 10 years old that it’ll never arrive. But then Python is older than Java and here we are.

I decided long ago (after having implemented various protocols and shared-memory multi-threaded code) that what i like best is to use Erlang as "the fabric" for the graph of distributed computing and C/C++ for heavy lifting at any node.

I’m hoping the JIT will finally start to change that.

Yes, my sense reading the article was the user is reinventing Erlang.

> writing software that contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang

Since you were at AWS (?), you'd know that Erlang did get its shot at distributed systems there. I'm unsure what went wrong, but if not c/c++, it was all JVM based languages soon after that.

No I worked a contract in the retail side and would not wish that job on anyone. My most recent favorite boss works there now and I haven’t even said hi because I’m afraid he’ll offer me a job.

I have noticed that in corporate, langauges dont fail on technical merit, but its fashion merits.