Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is kind of an odd chasm. Users care about and pay for pixels. Sometimes decision makers care about underlying technologies as they don't actually interact with the pixels (e.g. SAP).

I also think that not caring at all about the underlying stuff (particularly if approached from a standpoint of arrogance) can cause you to miss important inflection points that might make a huge difference. Of course, the opposite (e.g. arrogantly not caring about the pixels) is probably worse.



> It is kind of an odd chasm.

It not an odd chasm, it's a wrong (and fake) chasm.

If you bring in a bit of (proper) engineering and some common sense it's easy to determine there's a threshold under which it makes sense to pay a PAAS and above which it makes sense to pay an SRE and look at managing infrastructure yourself.

Engineering is not a matter of what side to pick and what belief-system to adopt. Engineering is essentially all about trade-offs.


>> your customer pays for delivered features

I was responding to this comment in a general sense, not weather or not to use managed services.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: