Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> And yes, ending the Russian-Ukrainian war is in fact de-escalation, even if giving Russia what they want is the outcome.

That’s what they said about the Sudentenland, too.




Indeed, sometimes de-escalation is followed by further escalation. By your implied metric, every ceasefire that wasn't permanent was a failure.

Sudentenland is the exception that makes the rule. Throughout history, most peace agreements have not been immediately violated by the "winning" side.


> most peace agreements have not been immediately violated by the "winning" side.

Most peace agreements are signed when the war is over and one side has given up. Most peace agreements aren’t attempts at appeasement.


And this war won't end either, if neither side gives in.


That’s the thing about war—if it goes on long enough, it eventually ends, because one side is unable to continue it. And if it’s the aggressor, then that stops them from continuing their aggression.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: