Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For one-shot programs like Babel, Prettier, Terser, etc. mentioned in this article, I don‘t see how the lack of a garbage collector is a strong argument for an alternative language.


Nobody is making this argument for JS tooling.

The article does mentions GC, but that's just demonstrating differences between JS and Rust.

The other popular JS-tooling alternative is esbuild, which is built in Golang, which has a GC.

If anything, the two most common arguments in favor of Rust for this specific use case are null-pointer safety and speed.


The article honestly doesn't make any sense. Even the title is wrong.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: