Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, but at least those don't have hardware lock-in.


WhatsApp absolutely has hardware lock-in. You need to be an Apple or Google customer to use it, and you need at least one Android or iOS phone.


Wow. I assumed you could use Whatsapp on the web but you literally can't. You have to have an Android or Iphone. I guess maybe there's a way to fake it with emulators on your computer but that's a lot of work that you shouldn't need to have to do.


Well, it is tied to your phone number, idk if hardware lock in and vendor lock in are in the same camp exactly


You can use Whatsapp on the web, but you can't create an account on the web.


Worse they require frequent logins on device to keep the with client working. Just making the account on device isn't enough. You have to maintain it as well.


The requirement is not exactly "iOS or Android", the requirement is "SIM card with valid phone number". Otherwise, you could use it on iPads and Android tablets, which you normally can't.

WhatsApp accounts are directly tied to a single phone number, both for user discovery (that way, you can simply message everybody in your contacts who has the app - just the way user expect it to work) and for spam prevention.

Creating a smartphone messaging app without this feature would be orders of magnitude more difficult, you simply can't get normie users to go around "hey, what's your WhatsApp user name?"


None of my phones can run WhatsApp, even though they do have SIM cards. That's because none of them runs iOS or Android.


An Android emulator with Play Services should work in theory, but I haven’t tried it. They could have extra checks to prevent that.


You can install whatsapp on degoogled phones as well! No need of play services.


This.

I think there’s also an unofficial Python library, so you can write a simple script that keeps your account active (and use the web client).


> degoogled phones

It's still Android. How do I do it on a GNU/Linux phone?


Waydroid.


Is it possible to install WhatsApp on one of the three major 3rd-party AOSP-based operating systems (distros): Graphene OS, Calyx OS, or Lineage OS?

Each one has varying models for replacing functionality of the Google Play Services, and IIRC the Aurora store [1] allows for installation of apps from Google Play without a Google account.

It's not a combination of steps that would be accessible to the average user, but I think it should be possible to use WhatsApp without being an Apple or Google customer (nominally a customer of Google hardware---Pixel phones---if using Graphene or Calyx, and ultimately a customer of Meta/Facebook for WhatsApp itself).

[1]: https://aurorastore.org/


It is. Works great without Google services (maybe pushes don’t work though, I can’t remember), or with microG.

> It's not a combination of steps that would be accessible to the average user

Tangential, but I’m thinking about starting a degoogled phone shop. Not sure if it’s a good business idea, but I think there is at least some demand there.

EDIT: aurorastore[.]org you link to is not the official site by the way. I’d not trust the APKs you get there. The official is https://auroraoss.com/ (and the downloads on F-Droid should be legit, too).


> Tangential, but I’m thinking about starting a degoogled phone shop. Not sure if it’s a good business idea, but I think there is at least some demand there.

Sounds like an incredible amount of pain for very little gain.

* Even in my bubble (CS nerds, Linux only, FOSS developers, ect.), only around 20% run custom ROMs on their phones. The demand is tiny.

* Even the very best UX ROMs (GrapheneOS on a modern Pixel, with full Google Services re-installed in a sandbox) will drive normies crazy. Google Lens and Android Auto are non-trivial to get running. Google Pay/Wallet is straight up impossible. And again, this is on a re-googled de-googled phone. Can't imagine how bad it's with a truely de-googled phone.

* If you go back into the walled garden defeated, you lose almost everything you did outside it. The few things you don't lose, you will have to work hard for.

The few customers you would get would create a high number of support requests, and be very unhappy with whatever you could do for them. Everybody not needing your support already runs LinageOS/GrapheneOS successfully on their own.


Yeah, probably not really worth it.

> Google Pay/Wallet is straight up impossible

FWIW, microG seems to have fixed Play Integrity (again), so Google Pay is not out of the question now. (It’s still very painful though, even on LineageOS with Google services without a sandbox I can’t get it working – though it seems that my device was flagged specifically, and in theory it should work with some hacks.)

And I think Google Lens should work out of the box :thinking:


What's worse, and what people gloss over, is that you have to sync your contacts to Facebook/Meta in order to use WhatsApp. That's a lot of very private information that tells them a lot about you. There is a reason why Facebook paid bajillions for WhatsApp and maintains it, even though the communication is encrypted and there are no ads — it's not out of the goodness of their noble hearts.

But try telling this to anyone and watch their eyes glaze over in a matter of seconds.


You don't have to. At least on iOS I've managed to get away without doing it until now. WhatsApp does make it inconvenient to do stuff without syncing contacts though.


You said it yourself -- customers have options.

Also, you forgot KaiOS.


Unfortunately WhatsApp stopped supporting KaiOS.


They have a desktop version of WhatsApp.


As far as I know, the desktop requires you to sign-in via QR code from a mobile phone that you're logged into whatsapp on.


Yeah, well, you need a computer to go on the internet! Where’s the freedom there!? /s


Your comment is missing the point.

Even if you do have a smartphone, you might be running some flavor of Linux on it. Or maybe Google terminated your account due to some false positive.


I use WhatsApp on my desktop


The desktop version requires you to connect with your phone. It's just a proxy to your phone.


You only need an iCloud+ account not an Apple device.

Thus there’s zero hardware lock-in, an Android user could send invites. Though obviously iCloud is more appealing if you’re part of there ecosystem, you can just use it for file storage etc.


From the article, however, you don't technically need an apple device...an iCloud+ account is sufficient. That said, I don't know many people with iCloud+ who aren't already in the Apple ecosystem, and obviously anything Apple releases will obviously have some advantage to it if you use the hardware alone.


No one other than the organizer needs anything Apple.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: