Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Given the costs involved in all the back and forth that a typical retraction involves, I can't see the journals wanting to deal with it.


I see the forbidden terms include "gender" and google scholar returns 5.3 million results with that. It's all a bit silly. Next they'll ban European languages for being gendered.


They actually like male/female enforced gender. Maybe what they’ll do is add gender to English grammar!


  La primera pregunta es: Que es mas macho, pineapple o knife?

  Well, let's see
  My guess is that a pineapple is more macho than a knife

  Si! Correcto! Pineapple es mas macho que knife

  La segunda pregunta es: Que es mas macho, lightbulb o schoolbus?
  Uh, lightbulb?

  No! Lo siento, Schoolbus es mas macho que lightbulb

  Gracias. And we'll be back in un momento
~ https://youtu.be/6mRq1xgKykM?t=95


I wonder how that'd go. Like in French "the book is on the table" is "le livre est sur la table" so I guess it'd become something like "he book is on she table"? We might need some new words. Or just steal the French ones "le book is on la table"? Vive la franglais!


Old English had gender, and the feminine definite article to match masculine the would be theo. (The whole concept of "the" was a late addition, mind you, and Middle English followed soon after and got rid of grammatical gender, apparently because an influx of Nordics had trouble with pronunciation.)


Half the point of the order is Trump’s admin wants gendered language. That is:

Pregnant person -> pregnant woman

Pregnant people -> pregnant women




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: