> Well first you said it didn’t happen in France - and it did.
It did, shortly, then Apple got fined and then the feature was removed, yes, there's no contradiction whatsoever with anything I said.
> No one has ever accused the EU of being tech literate.
First it has no link with the EU, and then you said it wasn't about tech but “physics”. And surely Apple would hire lawyers familiar enough with physics to be able to explain it…
> And that feature is still part of iOS…
But now at least it's opt-out because Apple was forced to do something against the backlash. Nobody would have called that shady if they communicated clearly about the throttling and made it opt-out from the get go (or even better: wait before such a issue gets triggered once before throttling the phone, and explicitly tell the user when it happens…). And surely that's what company that cares about user experience as much as Apple would do … if they weren't trying to screw their customers.
> First it has no link with the EU, and then you said it wasn't about tech but “physics”. And surely Apple would hire lawyers familiar enough with physics to be able to explain it…
So now are you back to saying that rechargeable battery degradation is not a thing? It is literally physics
No that's not what I'm saying, and you know it, you're just falling back to this absurd argument because that's all you have.
What I'm saying is that Apple's army of lawyer failed to justify how this behavior was indeed justified by laws of physics, and obviously you cannot do better than them. Your argument is just one of a fanboy coping against facts.
Apple fanboys are really the best when it comes to defend the indefensible.