At this point in history it's wrong to suggest that any mass communication mediu...

poszlem · 2025-01-19T19:57:55 1737316675

And using BlueSky as an example of a "non-politicized" platform is even more inaccurate.

hb-robo · 2025-01-22T14:59:31 1737557971

It's politicized by default when it stands in opposition to the most blatantly ideologically slanted social media site in existence this side of Gab and Truth Social.

threeseed · 2025-01-19T22:43:10 1737326590

You can. Threads achieved this for a while before Zuckerberg capitulated.

All you need to do is down-rank political content in general and prevent it from appearing in For You type feeds.

Then it just becomes a case of people needing to specifically follow political content which heavily limits its reach.

rexpop · 2025-01-20T04:08:52 1737346132

Down-ranking "political content" requires a definition of "politics" which is, inherently, an ideological posture, QED all content that remains is "political content."

It's an oxymoron.

threeseed · 2025-01-20T11:10:27 1737371427

Like I said Threads did this and it was effective.

So much so all the journalists left for BlueSky and they have had to reverse it.