Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The irony is that he didn't say that at all and it's actually you who assumed this.



I’ll quote the parent comment again:

> To filter things based on the owner's identity… may disadvantage my business by making my own products (build from their components) worse.

Filtering based on identity can hurt his business by making his products worse. The line between cause and effect that he’s drawing seems pretty clear to me. What other interpretation would you have for that?

And for the sake of completeness let’s ask a 3rd party.

ChatGPT prompt:

“”” Given the following sentence:

To filter things based on the owner's identity… may disadvantage my business by making my own products (build from their components) worse.

To what is the reader attributing a potential lower quality in his products? “””

Response:

“””

The reader is attributing the potential lower quality of their products to the filtering based on the owner’s identity. This implies that restricting components based on who owns them could limit access to necessary or high-quality components, thereby negatively impacting the quality of the products they build. “””


Yes you need to read carefully and not let your own assumptions get in the way.

He did say: Filtering based on the owner's identity is bad. He did not say: Filtering based on the owner's identity is bad while that identity matches a person of color




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: