Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The Death of Intel

I know they are not doing well number wise but is it correct to claim this? Or it exaggerated?

If it is somewhat true, what could Intel ideally do to not die? The article talks about Gelsinger's naivete and provides a quanitity for wafers but I don't know what that means.



It probably means the death of a high net income business or a business that leads in its field.

They fall sufficiently far back that they can no longer afford to pay the wages and capital expenses necessary to compete.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: