Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
thatcat
7 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Scientific American's departing editor and the pol...
It is simply saying the assumption of a normal distribution is incorrect for the population, which without context of what particular data they were observing would be impossible to know if it is in fact nonsense.
jayd16
7 months ago
[–]
So, quite sesnsical indeed but possibly, circumstantially incorrect? It seems like a non-controversial stance to take.
Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: