Your implicit premise is that we vote for policy. Democracy works despite the majority not understanding much about policy.
One critical strength of democracy is that it allows voters to remove the current politician - even if that politician would rather not be removed.
Where would you pick your line? Small moves of the line change the size of the disenfranchised group.
And I have to admire your chutzpah of suggesting tests to create a disenfranchised group on an article showing serious flaws with testing... Of course you haven't suggested a single way to fix any flaws. I sincerely hope you are not working in any engineering role.
Your implicit premise is that we vote for policy. Democracy works despite the ma. . . | Hacker News. (n.d.). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41914604
One critical strength of democracy is that it allows voters to remove the current politician - even if that politician would rather not be removed.
Where would you pick your line? Small moves of the line change the size of the disenfranchised group.
And I have to admire your chutzpah of suggesting tests to create a disenfranchised group on an article showing serious flaws with testing... Of course you haven't suggested a single way to fix any flaws. I sincerely hope you are not working in any engineering role.