Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OK, but still:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple–FBI_encryption_dispute

Apple's reaction to a number of such things has been to further enhance encryption.

They go to a good deal of trouble to make things they can't break. Look at the new cloud compute model they're introducing:

https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/

And if you've missed it, note the prior "verified contact" key exchange added to iMessages, as well as the "sorry we can't read your backups to help you recover your data" security added to iCloud (provided you only use devices up-to-date and opted in). This one is a customer service nightmare, they added it anyway.

All that said, this article is less interesting since (a) if your cell phone uses a telco, "they" know where you are, and where you've been, no Apple needed; and (b) unlike Apple segmenting your Maps directions to prevent themselves from knowing where you are going, Google's always been about your location.



Counterpoint:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41184153

Apple was caught issuing issuing OCSP queries (hello, XKEYSCORE) every time an app was launched, promised to stop logging and build an opt-out, then reneged and memory-holed the promise.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: