Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

ideally the economy is nice and efficient and is optimized so that everybody can afford to live a decent life while having plenty of money to spare, which they can spend however they want, and which they will in practice spend on lots of arts and culture.

Instead we have an economy that is ruthless about costing as much as everybody can afford, and a culture that when there's more resources wants more and bigger stuff, leaving little surplus for culture, which often has to be funded with ads and grift because it is counterintuitive to fund it directly.

at least we've still got government-backed culture like arts councils and grants ... without that we'd be even more desperate.

but if you want a lot more art, make food, rent, education, and healthcare affordable, so that people have time and resources left over and don't feel the financial anxiety of capitalism breathing down their neck.



A great of deal of history’s greatest works of art have been produced by artists in dire personal circumstances.


is that so? I have no idea what the % is. Maybe it's very small.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: