Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is much needed nuance that is sorely missing from these discussions. I'm sure it will fall on mostly deaf ears, but thank you for that.

There's a lot of criticism against Apple for not doing things in the right order. Repairability is one of them. Would it have been better for their devices to be easier to repair from the original iPhone? Sure. Would it have been better for you, me, or Apple to focus on repairability above all else? Absolutely not.

In the meantime, Apple have built a device service model that looks like this for the average consumer:

Having a high degree of confidence that the product will be serviceable with OEM parts, which do not impact the resale value by causing buyer confusion, guarantees of these replacement parts working, having these parts available for years and years, and that the company is not going to disappear, through a network of nearby first and third party repair shops, at a transparent and reasonable price.

Like most criticism of Apple, there is a concentrated yelling at one particular tree, while missing the forest around. It can be valid criticism and missing the bigger picture at the same time.



To be absolutely fair, after the iPhone 4, they could and should have totally focused on repairability above everything else.

Sure we got some more pixels out of cameras but that's not much when you've got to throw them away after X years.


they could and should have totally focused on repairability above everything else.

Why? They almost certainly would have spent extra money on R&D and seen lower sales (due to sacrificing performance, battery life, durability, water resistance, etc) as a result. What would have been the incentive for them to do so?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: