Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It makes US service providers, like Google and Amazon, very unattractive for businesses that require worldwide coverage

You know what is much more unattractive to these businesses? Getting on the wrong side of the US government. And honestly, I don't see any business (except for ones in Russia, China and Iran) changing provider because they don't provide service to Iran.

> damaging to our businesses (no worldwide service)

I'm confused, are you arguing here for allowing free-tier services under the sanction regime, or for getting rid of sanctions against Iran altogether? If it's the latter, then the argument is self-consistent. But if it's the former, then you're effectively saying that an american business which currently doesn't provide any services to iranian customers would instead prefer to provide free-tier services for them without any way to get them to paid tier, and that doesn't make any sense. If you know that users from a certain region would always be at 0% conversion, you would get nothing by providing them with a free tier.



Imagine wikipedia was looking for new hosting.

They consider Google cloud, but then reject it because GCP cannot serve users in Iran, and Wikipedia's policy is to be globally available.

Google loses worldwide revenue from all of wikipedia.

(I have met multiple companies who have dismissed GCP for this reason. Even companies with no current business in Iran might one day want to expand there, so don't want to make infrastructure choices which lock them out).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: