Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't expect to get a reply given how popular this article and discussion was and given how late I am but ...

What are the ethical considerations here?

The opening reply that kickstarted this particular thread was:

> You could say that about literally any shady business

But that user never bothered to qualify what exactly they consider to be "shady" about Mr. Beast's business.

Other than the fact that he has a hugely successful YouTube channel, I know next to nothing about him. I don't watch his content. From what I gather it is mass appeal entertainment.

I've read in some of the replies that he does philanthropic content and there are some un-cited claims that he "pockets" donations (that would be shady if true, but again - those claims were void of any links that would give them credibility).

Others seem to package-deal him in with all of YouTube creators, and they will cite shitty things that other content creators have done for clout as if Mr. Beast himself (or his company) did those things.

Most of the postings here seem to hate him for being successful at creating YouTube content that they personally don't like.

If you want to convince me that a YouTube channel is unethical, then point me towards the victims. Show me who he is hurting and make a clear case for how he is directly responsible for hurting them.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: