> PS. On a tangent, rethorically - baring bugs and security - at one point is (if ever) software "finished"?
“PS” originates from “post scriptum”, meaning “written after”. It doesn’t make sense to have it at the start of the text.
But to answer your question, yes, it is definitely possible for software to be done and finished. I’ve done it multiple times, where I have built something that does exactly what I set it out to do, it does it fast and without bugs and has been doing so for years and years with zero maintenance needs.
The general obsession with the idea that “software is never done, only abandoned” needs to end, it’s harmful to good software and its users.
Here’s millions more examples of finished software, in a single word: games.
“PS” originates from “post scriptum”, meaning “written after”. It doesn’t make sense to have it at the start of the text.
But to answer your question, yes, it is definitely possible for software to be done and finished. I’ve done it multiple times, where I have built something that does exactly what I set it out to do, it does it fast and without bugs and has been doing so for years and years with zero maintenance needs.
The general obsession with the idea that “software is never done, only abandoned” needs to end, it’s harmful to good software and its users.
Here’s millions more examples of finished software, in a single word: games.