Nope. That is LGPL. Under (A)GPL if you make a derivative work you have obligati... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		dspillett on Aug 15, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why we picked AGPL Nope. That is LGPL. Under (A)GPL if you make a derivative work you have obligations even if you do not modify. Easy. [Well, not so easy, as this discussion and the likes of Minio saying “get your own lawyer to tell you what our licence says” illustrate – what constitutes a derived work is apparently not objectively well-defined] Don't believe me? Ask Google and their vast legal team: https://opensource.google/documentation/reference/using/agpl...

camgunz on Aug 16, 2024 [–]

Neither the AGPLv3 nor your link reference "derivative works". It's a GPLv2 concept they jettisoned for (A)GPLv3.

https://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2014/SFLC-Guide_to_GPL...

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact