Good for you. Why didn’t you answer my question though?
> Have you considered that maybe Airhart and its founders have thought through those inevitable hurdles and decided to push forward anyway?
Do you genuinely think you’re the first person to tell them all of the reasons why they’re going to fail?
Wouldn’t it be much more useful to try to understand, in good faith, why they’re pushing forward with this venture anyway despite all of the hurdles in their future?
Have you considered that a significant number of companies that are presented - in good faith - as revolutionary startups that will open aviation to the masses are just investment schemes? I understand that they are pushing forward with this venture and are actively seeking investments "despite the hurdles" - what is your play in this?
> Have you considered that a significant number of companies that are presented - in good faith - as revolutionary startups that will open aviation to the masses are just investment schemes?
So you’re suggesting that Airhart is just engaged in an investment scheme? Do you have any evidence to support that?
Have you heard of occam's razor? Time will tell - in the meantime what you chose to believe and what I chose to believe are equally worthless opinions.
> Have you considered that maybe Airhart and its founders have thought through those inevitable hurdles and decided to push forward anyway?
Do you genuinely think you’re the first person to tell them all of the reasons why they’re going to fail?
Wouldn’t it be much more useful to try to understand, in good faith, why they’re pushing forward with this venture anyway despite all of the hurdles in their future?