Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I regularly play in Vegas poker no limit hold’em tournaments, and am substantially positive. These are 12+ hour/day, multi day tournaments, and a bad player with luck just isn’t going to last the grind. 90% of the people in these tournaments have no reason being there. The top 10% are solid, and within that group, it does come down to luck.


I think that 90% of the people have no reason being there is the sweet point? But this is tournament so you have to be in the first X to win some return, right?

I'm not a professional player but I have observed in more than a trivial amount of occurences there are sharks in casinos picking the right cash table to maximize returns. They seem to know each other and don't play against each other, but always try to pick a table of fishes. I don't know if I'm thinking too much though.


Isn't that a legitimate part of learning professional poker? To measure how much you play against (now) known strong players?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: