The Supreme Court wasn't even asked to define exactly what is official versus un... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

nradov 12 months ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity fo...

The Supreme Court wasn't even asked to define exactly what is official versus unofficial in this case. It will now return to a lower court to address that point, which is the normal way for the process to work.

downWidOutaFite 12 months ago [–]

That is a scam. The tests given in the opinion mean that they were all official because they involved federal elections. The case is over.

The president now has immunity to corrupt elections as he wishes. I honestly don't understand how any American can be happy about this.

Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact